x1 is passively x2-able (especially «se x2») under conditions x3; x1 is such that event x2 (nu) can happen to it; it is possible that x1 may undergo x2.
Experimental rafsi: «-fe'e-». See also: frika'e, ifkakne, kakne. ifka'e is frika'e, except x2 is especially focused on its own x2 rather than x1 (as though applied with se or that ce («(goi'ai) tcekitau») is more likely to be in the x2 rather than x1 of ifka'e's x2), although se is not guaranteed and other possibilities are valid as well (such as te or nothing at all). This word also is created to add an experimental rafsi that ends in a vowel, so that it can be used at the end of a word in place of ka'e, in case adding a «-ka'e» suffix also has a parallel / symmetric place structure that also makes sense, rather than ifka'e being the only especially meaningful word (note especially CLL 12.9: ‘Note that, with these lujvo, an interpretation requiring SE insertion is safe only if the alternatives are either implausible or unlikely to be needed as a lujvo. This may not always be the case, and Lojbanists should be aware of the risk of ambiguity.’) (see also CLL 12.4 and 12.3); in this case, «-fe'e» can be added. «-fe'e» is like adding a «-ka'e» suffix and prepending «sel-» to the seltau. (Definition text based on that of ifkakne by krtisfranks.) ce, when unspecified or left to its defaults, is often but not always the first available place, but if the x2 if ifka'e is a property, and ce is unspecified or left to its defaults, ifka'e modifies the interpretation of this default behaviour so that the second place is used instead, but again, it could be a different place or even somewhere deep inside some implied modal. See also: kekna. Alternative experimental gismu form: kekna. However, the 12.9 guideline isn't always applicable (CLL 12.1: ‘There are no absolute laws fixing the place structure of a newly created lujvo. The maker must consider the place structures of all the components of the tanru and then decide which are still relevant and which can be removed. What is said in this chapter represents guidelines, presented as one possible standard, not necessarily complete, and not the only possible standard. There may well be lujvo that are built without regard for these guidelines, or in accordance with entirely different guidelines, should such alternative guidelines someday be developed. The reason for presenting any guidelines at all is so that Lojbanists have a starting point for deciding on a likely place structure — one that others seeing the same word can also arrive at by similar consideration.’).