x_{1} (agent) asserts/claims/declares x_{2} (du'u) is true [can be used for epistemology of authority].

Also: x_{1} states/says that/affirms/purports to know that x_{2}.
(cf. natfe which is propositional and non-agentive, nupre)

- natfe
- x
_{1}(du'u) contradicts/denies/refutes/negates x_{2}(du'u) under rules/logic x_{3}. - nupre
- x
_{1}(agent) promises/commits/assures/threatens x_{2}(event/state) to x_{3}[beneficiary/victim]. - ju'a
- evidential: I state - (default) elliptical/non-specific basis.
- jifxu'a
- xu
_{1}is wrongly/falsely claiming xu_{2}=j_{1}, by truth standard xu_{3}. - posxu'a
- x
_{1}=p_{1}claims ownership of x_{2}=p_{2}in condition p_{3}. - sezyxu'a
- s
_{2}=x_{1}(agent) self-affirms/claims/declares s_{1}=x_{2}(duâ€™u) is true about ones identity/self. - tolxu'a
- x
_{1}(agent) denies that x_{2}(du'u) is true. - tradutxu'a
- x
_{1}=t_{1}is hypocritical in action t_{2}=d_{1}, which is contrary to assertion x_{2}, under conditions t_{3}. - xusfrimo'i
- x
_{1}remembers hearsay x_{2} - xusyju'o
- x
_{1}knows hearsay x_{2}from source x_{3}; x_{2}is a hearsay - zerfuzyxu'a
- x
_{1}accuses x_{2}of charge/crime x_{3}before judge/authority x_{4}. - tipre
- x
_{1}asks question x_{2}(du'u) to x_{3}regarding x_{4} - mirgumi
- x
_{1}is the author of document x_{2}from the viewpoint of whom discourse of x_{2}is made - usra
- x
_{1}asserts proposition x_{2}to audience x_{3}.